Topographic
MapPROFILE CONSTRUCTION
(X and/or Y), Z axes
Remember from the beginning of this chapter that a topographic map is a two-dimensional representation of our three-dimensional world. On a map, the visual impact of elevation is sacrificed so that horizontal relationships can be immediately seen. A topographic profile is a restatement of spatial relationships which emphasizes the vertical axis and deemphasizes the horizontal axes. A topographic profile has a vertical axis (elevation) and a horizontal axis (any line on the topographic map). Profiles are used to emphasize slopes and changes in slope angles across a map. They are usually aligned perpendicular to major structural/topographic trends. They may be constructed with a horizontal scale in common with the base map, larger, or smaller, and with no or significant vertical exaggeration.
Vertical Exaggeration. The vertical exaggeration is the ratio between the vertical scale and the horizontal scale. If the two are the same the ratio is 1 and there is no vertical exaggeration. If the horizontal scale is 1:24000 and the vertical scale is 1:2400, the vertical exaggeration is:
(1/2400)/(1/24000) = 10
NOTE: Vertical exaggeration is NEVER used unless there is a definite need for it. If there is no vertical exaggeration, slopes will be shown to scale and approximate slope angles can be scaled from the profile. Use vertical exaggeration only if there are subtle slope features which must be shown, and even then use the smallest exaggeration which has the desired results. Large vertical exaggerations are the prime cause of difficulty in the interpretation of profiles.
Common scale profiles. Topographic profiles generated at a common scale with the base map are the most frequently used. They have the advantage of being able to be placed on the map along the line of profile and compared to the base map. This is particularly important in the preparation of geological cross-sections (below).
To generate a common-scale profile:
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
| Enlarged Profiles. A profile at a scale smaller (thus a view larger) than that of the base map, most useful where direct comparisons will not be made and great detail must be shown, can be constructed almost as easily as a common-scale profile. First, you must decide what scale you wish to use. Usually a scale which is easy to graph, such as 1:10,000, is chosen. Then the graph paper, with vertical and horizontal scales and axes already on the paper, is placed on the map with one end of the profile touching the graph paper and the paper angled away from the profile line. The angle should be such that a perpendicular from the other end of the profile line intersects the graph paper at the other end of the profile. A triangle is the most convenient tool to use to define the perpendiculars. The graph paper should be taped (with masking tape) to the map so that it will not shift as perpendiculars are drawn from the contours on the profile line on the map to the graph paper. The profile is then constructed as above. |
|
| Reduced Profiles. Reduced profiles are drawn where direct comparisons will not be made with the base map and there is a need to generalize or fit a long profile on a short piece of paper. Like enlarged profiles, the scale should be chosen for convenience. Also like an enlarged profile, a reduced profile is constructed by placing the graph paper at an angle to the profile line on the base map. The only difference in the construction method is that in order to reduce the size of the profile the perpendiculars are run from the graph paper to the profile line, whereas in order to enlarge the profile they are run from the profile line to the graph paper. |
![]() |
| EXERCISE: Draw a common-scale profile across the hogbacks on the Indian Hills map (see "Slope Angle" chapter) along or parallel to line A - A'. |