Last modified May 5, 1999
Back to Previous Page
Return to Table of Contents
 
Erosional Landscapes at the 300 level
Sara Lyle and Terry Phillips 
Erosional glacial landscapes are a product of the work done by interconnected systems of physical and internal ice flow processes.  The erosion of rock beds is most influenced by bedrock lithology and the weathering state of the rocks prior to glaciation. 
Landscape Classification of Glacial Erosion
Landscapes of Antarctica and Greenland
Variables which Affect Glacial Erosion
Cross-cutting Relationships and Case Examples
Landscape Sculpture and Styles of Erosion
Landscape Modeling
Small and Large Scale Landforms
Bibliography and Further Reading

Landscape Classification of Glacial Erosion
(modified from Sugden, 1976, p.192)
Glacier System
Glacier Type
Flow Process
Landscape Type
 ice sheets  
and
 ice domes sheet flow little to no erosion 
areal scouring
ice caps outlet glaciers stream flow selective linear erosion
glaciers constrained 
by topography
valley glaciers stream flow alpine landscapes 
cirque landscapes
Landscapes are typically classified into five major categories:  (1) landscapes which exhibit little to no erosion, landscapes dominated by (2) areal scour or (3) selective linear erosion, (4) alpine landscapes, and (5) cirque landscapes.  Composite landscapes also occur as (1) those carved by ice sheets, ice caps, and valley glaciers contemporaneously, and (2) where successive phases of valley glacier and ice sheet or ice cap erosion carved the landscape.  Excellent examples of composite erosional landscapes include the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets, and are discussed in Landscapes of Antarctica and Greenland on this web page..


Variables which Affect Glacial Erosion
(modified from Benn and Evans, 1992, p. 312)

Many influences control the processes and patterns of glaciation, as well as the form, size, and distribution of erosional forms.
The four major factors include:
 
1.  Glaciological variables (characteristics of the ice, especially at the bed):  include basal shear and normal stress, subglacial water pressures and the local drainage system arrangement, as well as the flow direction, basal velocity, thermal regime, and the amount of debris entrained in the ice.
2.  Substratum characteristics (physical properties of the bed):  include the underlying geologic structure, lithology, fracture and joint distribution of the bedrock, the degree of previous weathering of the bedrock, thickness and composition of unconsolidated sediments, and the permeability of the underlying sediments.
3.  Topographic variables:  On a grand scale, topography may define a cachement area, influence the location of glacial ice masses, their morphology, and mass budget.  On a small scale, topography may act as a roughness element, define local flow patterns, and determine stress locations at the bed. 
4.  Temporal variables: control the duration of a glaciation, as well as the changes in the above variables across time. 


Landscape Sculpture and Styles of Erosion
(pending permission from Flint, 1971, p. 140-141)
Erosional glacial landscapes are a product of the interconnected systems of physical and internal glacial ice flow processes at work.  Erosion of rock beds is most influenced by the underlying bedrock lithology and the weathering state of the rocks prior to glaciation.  Of utmost importance is the fact that basal sliding and significant erosion do not occur if the basal ice is not at the pressure melting point (PMP).  Therefore, landscapes which exhibit little or no erosion were located in parts of the glacier's system where the basal ice was below the PMP, and there was little to no movement between the ice and the bedrock.  Likewise, areas that resulted in selective linear erosion had the basal ice at or above the PMP only in troughs.  You can learn more about how erosional processes work in the "Erosional Processes" sections of our hypertext, which are discussed at the introductory (descriptive) level or, for a more detailed explanation, also at the 300 level.
 
 
Styles of Glacial Erosion:
I.  Pattern of distribution of erosional glacial landforms
(pending permission from Benn and Evans, 1998, p. 373)
This diagram illustrates a dominantly streamlined erosional landscape, even though it includes trough erosion and selective linear erosion as well as areal scour.  Trough erosion is the most efficient type of glacial erosion, as it causes the most dramatic erosion and landscape modification of all.  Selective linear erosion produces streamlined landforms.  The influence of areal scour erosion by an ice sheet does the least amount of erosion and landscape modification because it polishes the existing resistant bedrock rather than carving or breaking the rocks and incorporating them into the ice.
II.  Landscape modification by ice sheets versus alpine glaciation
(pending permission from Benn and Evans, 1998, p. 373)
The erosional influence of ice sheets versus alpine glaciation is evident in this diagram.  The erosive potential of ice sheets is distributed across a large area, which decreases the amount of concentrated energy locally available to influence the morphology of the landscape.  Modification by local alpine glaciation is indicated by vertical lines, where the closest line spacing represents the highest amount of landscape modification.  Horizontal lines indicate modification by ice sheets, with the closest line spacing represents the highest amount of landscape modification.  Areas which have been influenced by both types of glacial systems.
III.  Idealized examples of different types of glacial erosion
(pending permission from  Benn and Evans, 1998, p. 374)
The influence of ice sheets and alpine glaciation upon landscape modification and evolution is evident in this diagram.  This figure represents (a) a preserved proglacial landscape, (b) mountain glaciation, (c) interconnected valleys of ice sheet glaciation, and (d) areal scour.

Small and Large-scale Landforms

Erosional landscapes are composed of smaller-scale erosional features and landforms which demonstrate the processes and conditions at work when they are formed.  Small-scale erosional forms include striae, rat tails, chattermarks, crescentic gouges and fractures, and p-forms.  Intermediate-scale erosional forms include roches mountonnees, whalebacks and rock drumlins, crag and tails, and channels (such as nye channels, tunnel valleys, ice-marginal (lateral) channels, proglacial channels, and flood tracks).  Large-scale erosional landforms include rock basins and overdeepenings, basins in soft sediments, troughs and fiords, cirques, and strandflats.  A more complete discussion of these landforms and features may be found in the Erosional Landscapes section of our hypertext.


Landscapes of Antarctica and Greenland
(pending permission from Sugden, 1976, p. 201-202)
The landscape distribution of Antarctica is dominated by ice shelves to the left (north) around the West Antarctic Ice Sheet.  The East Antarctic Ice Sheet has some ice shelf development, as well as areal scouring and selective linear erosion.  The predominantly alpine landscapes in this region are probably a result of more coastal precipitation, as well as being at the ice sheet-mountain glacier interface. 
.
This map of Greenland illustrates the distribution of landscape types outside of the ice sheet margin.  Warm upwelling ocean currents from Great Britain bring water-saturated air masses and lots of snow to the eastern coastline.  This results in a great deal of precipitation along the southeast coastline, but creates an arid, low precipitation climate to the west.  The dominance of areal scouring along the southwestern coastline is probably a result of this dry, cold-based climate. 

Cross-cutting Relationships and Case Examples

Cross-cutting relationships are indicators of temporal or spatial (or both!) change at any scale.  Such relationships of landforms may represent the work of different glacial periods, or various stages of a single glaciation.  A small-scale example is the cross-cutting striae on bedrock of the Snowdon massif, Wales, or on a larger scale, the Tampere area of southwestern Finland.  Erosional landforms of these regions demonstrate cross-cutting relationships of striae, till fabric, and rock whalebacks.  A grander scale example of cross-cutting relationships would be the striae beneath the Laurentide ice sheet as described in Glaciers with Space:  Time in our hypertext.

Cross-cutting striae of the Snowdon massif, Wales
(pending permission from Benn and Evans, 1998, p. 317)
This map is a location map of a field area in the Snowdon area of western Wales.  The large dot represents the study area, the solid arrows represent early ice sheet movement, the broken arrows represent the more recent Loch Lomond (Younger Dryas) Stadial Glacier movement, and the solid line represents the spatial limit of the Loch Lomond Stadial Glacier.
Cross-cutting striae of the Snowdon massif, Wales
(pending permission from Benn and Evans, 1998, p. 317)
This illustration depicts the pattern of striae produced by early ice sheet flow.  The hatchured lines represent the areas from which ice sheet striations have been removed (for the most part) by Loch Lomond Stadial erosion.
Tampere area, southwestern Finland
(pending permission from Flint, 1971, p. 94)
This diagram demonstrates the relationship between striations, till fabric, and whalebacks formed during three successive directions of glacier movement during the same glaciation.  The bold, solid arrows represent the oldest direction of glacier movement, the bold, dashed arrows represent the direction of glacier flow during an intermediate stage, and the dashed arrows indicate the most recent motion (as interpreted by Virkkala, 1960).

Landscape Modeling
 
This diagram shows the evolution of a trough cross-profile as modelled by (Harbor 1988). The evolution of the troughs with respect to time are shown in succession downward.  Ice discharge, surface slope and bedrock are all constants.  The varying ice velocites create a greater amount of erosion at the base of the glacier.  These velocity differences create an overdeepening leaving the side walls almost vertical and susceptible to mass-wasting. 
 
 


Bibliography and Further Reading

Benn, Douglas I., and David J. A. Evans, 1998, Glaciers and Glaciation, Arnold Publishers, London, 734 p.

Flint, Richard Foster, 1971, Glacial and Quaternary Geology, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Canada, 892 p.

Harbor, Jonathan M., Hallet, Bernard, and Charles F. Raymond, 1988, "A numerical model of landform development by     glacial erosion", Nature, vol. 333, p. 347-349.

Harbor, Jonathan M., 1992, "Application of a general sliding law to simulating flow in a glacier cross-section", Journal of Glaciology, vol. 38, no. 128, p. 182-190.

Sugden, David E., and Brian S. John, 1976, Glaciers and Landscape:  A geomorphological approach, Halsted Press, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 376 p.
 
 
Return to the top of this page Back in hypertext 100 level of this topic Forward in hypertext Return to the table of contents